Raiders of the Lost
Ark is the first installment of Lucas’ Indiana Jones tales and it doesn’t
disappoint as Lucas continues to grow as a filmmaker. When I think of classic Indy images many of
them come from Raiders, like the
infamous rolling boulder booby trap set off by Indy’s misjudgment of weight
when stealing the idol. He sets this
film apart by playing on the humorous qualities of our famed archaeologist
while simultaneously developing a complex action plotline that is still fascinating
to follow. All parts of the story mesh
extremely well between the humor, action, and roller coaster of love that
Indiana Jones experiences along the way, not to mention a stellar cast helps
keep things interesting.
I have learned that Lucas is a great judge of setting and
just how, and especially when, to set a film in order to make the plotline more
believable and thrilling. Although Lucas
made the film in 1981, it is set fifty years earlier in the 1930s when a
discovery such as the lost ark would be most enticing to a group like the Nazi
regime. In typical Lucas fashion though, of course, the ark has magical
qualities that draw archaeologists, fascists, and local mystics towards it
alike. The battle that ensues to find
the legendary ark, supposedly holding the original ten commandment tablets, intertwines
with Jones’ own personal life by involving Marion, an ex-lover. Juxtaposing the real (WWII and Nazis) with
the mystical (magical powers emanating from the ten commandments) creates a
veritably exhilarating dynamic unlike that found in Star Wars. Both series are
clearly successful in their ventures to gain a following as well as to tell a
compelling action story, but Indiana Jones shows a different side of Lucas’
interests based in reality. Not every
film created by George Lucas has to be so ridiculous that only science fiction
lovers can relate to it.
Indiana Jones as a character is one of the most impressive
parts of Lucas’ creation. He is far more
complex than any of the Star Wars
leads, including Luke Skywalker, Darth Vader, and Han Solo. Those characters work so well together
because they are each rather one dimensional, but as a team complete each
other. Indy can stand on his own against
the likes of Han Solo, Luke Skywalker, the droids, and Princess Leia all
wrapped together. He represents many of
their various characteristics, such as the wit of the droids, the cunning of
Han Solo, and the unbridled bravery of Skywalker. Sometimes watching Harrison Ford play Indiana
Jones looks to me like George Lucas asked him to take all of his favorite
traits of the heroes of Star Wars and
try to make them into one. Jones’
complicated history and personality make him stimulating enough to follow solo
as opposed to as a part of a larger team that continues throughout all of his
adventures. Indy is not perfect though;
Lucas explicitly includes the fact that our hero is scared of snakes to give
him some type of weakness in a Superman/Clark Kent-esque vein. Not only is this a form of expertly crafted
comic relief, but also it makes Jones into a real person. As much as Indiana Jones can feel like a
James Bond type of character, he is flawed in a funny way that Bond lacks. The various dimensions of Indiana Jones make
him charismatic and enthusiastic, not like the dark shadows and undertones that
seem to follow every step Bond and Skywalker take.
Marion’s first cinematic introduction to Indiana Jones is
extremely revealing to our hero as a whole.
Lucas chooses to give our two romantic leads a past, but we are
introduced to them as a couple long after their first meeting. The scene in which they first interact with
each other illustrates the damaging past they once had with each other and
skips over the introductory scenes of romantic build-up that would usually
occur in film. Marion’s first words to
Jones are, “Indiana
Jones. I always knew some day you'd come walking back through my door. I never
doubted that. Something made it inevitable.”
The on-screen tensions is automatic between Marion and Indy even
though we have never seen them together as a pair before, and this is a truly
difficult feeling to convey to an audience.
Lucas excels in portraying relationships between his characters whether
it is platonic or overtly sexual. This
specific relationship works despite coming in directly in the middle of their
conflict resolution because of the strong sexual tension they have. It is not automatically romantic or harshly
platonic, but the tension gives them space to grow together.
In the end, Indy solves the mystery, survives, and gets the
girl, but Lucas leaves the ending open for sequels to come. We obviously know how successful the series
ultimately becomes, but without this first installment none of the following
films would have ever been conceivably possible.
No comments:
Post a Comment